**Update:  March 14, 2025** Over the past week, the GWG Litigation Trustee has reached agreements with additional defendants to resolve various matters, all of which are subject to court approval.  In addition to the previously reported conditional agreement to settle claims with Beneficient and Brad Heppner for $50.5 million and the settlement with Whitley Penn for $8.5 million (both detailed in our original post below), the Trustee has also secured settlements with Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities for $2.3 million, as well as with the law firm Mayer Brown LLP for $30 million. Collectively, the settlements total approximately $91.3 million, or about 5.6% of the $1.6 billion of GWG L Bonds that were outstanding when GWG filed for bankruptcy in April 2022.  The following is a summary of the settlements to date:

Defendants Allegations Settlement Amount
Brad Heppner and Beneficient (and affiliated trusts and entities) The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that GWG Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates engaged in a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of $1.6 billion in L Bonds, misleading investors about the company’s financial health and the safety of the investments. It claims that the defendants concealed critical information, misrepresented the use of proceeds, and operated a Ponzi-like structure, ultimately harming thousands of investors when the company collapsed into bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$50.5 million
Whitley Penn LLP The allegations against Whitley Penn LLP, GWG Holdings, Inc.’s auditor, include that the company failed to detect and report financial irregularities, contributing to GWG’s fraudulent scheme and subsequent bankruptcy. Whiteley Penn’s actions or inactions allegedly harmed investors.

 

 

$8.5 million
Mayer Brown LLP The allegations against Mayer Brown LLP include that the law firm, as counsel to GWG Holdings, Inc. before and after its bankruptcy filing, provided deficient legal advice and engaged in conflicts of interest, contributing to the company’s fraudulent activities and eventual bankruptcy. Pre-bankruptcy allegations include that the law firm aided and abetted GWG fiduciaries’ breaches of their fiduciary duties in certain transactions.

 

$30 million
Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, and related companies engaged in breaches of fiduciary duty and fraudulent conduct as officers, directors, or affiliates of GWG Holdings, Inc., contributing to its financial collapse and bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$2.3 million

 

Original Post:

In a significant development for GWG Holdings, Inc. L Bond investors, a $50.5 million settlement agreement was announced on March 7, 2025, aimed at resolving long-standing litigation tied to the company’s bankruptcy. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve been at the forefront of advocating for GWG L Bond investors, having already recovered over $3 million for our clients. This proposed settlement with certain defendants, including Beneficient and Brad Heppner, could impact thousands of investors who suffered losses when GWG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2022. Here’s what you need to know about the settlement, its implications, and how our firm can help you navigate this complex process.

Key Takeaways from the GWG L Bond Settlement

  • Settlement Amount: $50.5 million to be paid by Defendants’ insurers, pending court approval.
  • Litigation Resolved: Covers both a class action securities lawsuit and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding. The settlement resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021.
  • Distribution: Funds will be allocated to holders of Allowed Claims in GWG’s bankruptcy case, with an estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds before deductions. That’s a little over three cents for every dollar invested.
  • Opt-Out Contingency: The settlement could be terminated if too many investors opt out, with specific deadlines in place.
  • Bar Order Hearing: A hearing to finalize a bar order protecting settling Defendants is scheduled for April 16, 2025.
  • Next Steps for Investors: The best avenue of recovery for most GWG L Bond investors remains filing securities arbitration claims against the brokerage firm that sold these risky and speculative securities. Contact our law firm today for a free and no-obligation consultation.
  • Settlement with Whitley Penn: Separately, the GWG Litigation Trustee is seeking approval to settle claims with the accounting firm Whitley Penn for $8.5 million.

Understanding the GWG Holdings Settlement

Background: GWG’s Financial Collapse

GWG Holdings, Inc., a Dallas-based financial services company, marketed L Bonds as a high-yield investment tied to life insurance policies. However, the company faced mounting debt—over $1.3 billion in L Bonds—and regulatory scrutiny, culminating in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on April 20, 2022. This left thousands of investors, many of whom were retirees or conservative savers, with significant losses.

Since then, litigation has unfolded to recover funds for affected investors. The recent settlement marks a pivotal step in this process, addressing claims from both a securities class action (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding (Adv. Pro. No. 24-03090).

Settlement Details

Announced on March 7, 2025, the $50.5 million settlement involves Lead Plaintiff Frank Moore, GWG Litigation Trustee Michael Goldberg, and Defendants, including Brad Heppner and Beneficient entities. Key points include:

  • Funding: The settlement is financed entirely by the Defendants’ insurers, with proceeds forming a Settlement Fund plus interest.
  • Scope: It resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021, alleging securities law violations due to misleading statements in GWG’s Registration Statement.
  • Distribution Process: After deductions for taxes, administration costs, and attorneys’ fees (up to $8.48 million for Class Counsel and 35% for Trust Counsel), the net fund will be distributed through GWG’s bankruptcy plan. Investors with Allowed Claims can expect an average of $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds, though this is before deductions.

The settlement requires approval from both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Notices will be sent to eligible investors with options to participate, object, or opt out.

Opt-Out Contingency: A Critical Clause

A supplemental agreement, also dated March 6, 2025, introduces an opt-out threshold. If too many class members exclude themselves, the Defendants can terminate the settlement. This contingency underscores the importance of understanding your rights:

  • Deadlines: Opt-out requests must be tracked, with Defendants notified 14 days before the Settlement Hearing and a termination decision due 3 days prior.
  • Flexibility: Investors can retract opt-outs, potentially preserving the settlement if the threshold is met post-withdrawal.

This clause adds uncertainty, making legal guidance essential for investors deciding their next steps.

Bar Order Motion: Ensuring Finality

On March 7, 2025, a motion was filed to secure a bar order, preventing third parties from pursuing GWG-related claims against settling Defendants. This protects the Defendants in exchange for committing nearly all D&O insurance proceeds to the settlement. A hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. in Houston, Texas, with notice provided via the GWG Trust website and other channels.

What This Means for GWG L Bond Investors

Limited Recovery Potential

While $50.5 million is a substantial sum, it pales in comparison to GWG’s $1.3 billion L Bond debt. The estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit recovery—before fees and costs—suggests a modest return for investors. For those with significant holdings, this may not fully offset losses, highlighting the need for personalized legal strategies.

Next Steps for Investors

  • Review Your Eligibility: Confirm if you hold an Allowed Claim under GWG’s bankruptcy plan.
  • Evaluate Options: Decide whether to participate, opt out, or object to the settlement, keeping opt-out deadlines in mind.
  • Seek Legal Advice: The complexity of this settlement, coupled with the opt-out contingency and bar order, requires expert guidance to maximize recovery.

How Iorio Altamirano LLP Can Help

At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve recovered over $3 million for GWG L Bond investors through diligent advocacy and strategic litigation against broker-dealers and registered investment advisory firms that sold the GWG L Bonds to retail investors.

With the recovery to investors through the GWG Litigation Trustee’s efforts are likely to be nominal (in this case, a little over three cents for each dollar invested into GWG L Bonds), we continue to believe that GWG L Bonds investors’ best avenue for potential recovery of losses is to file a separate FINRA arbitration claim against their brokerage firms.

Our experience positions us uniquely to assist you in this settlement process:

  • Case Evaluation: We’ll assess your potential claims, explain your options, and guide you through the arbitration process.
  • Maximizing Recovery: Beyond this settlement, we explore additional avenues to recover losses, including claims against brokers or advisors who recommended GWG L Bonds.
  • Proven Results: Our track record speaks for itself—our clients trust us to fight for their financial recovery. We know as much about what happened with GWG Holdings, Inc. and how brokerage firms sold the risky and speculative GWG L Bonds as anyone.

Stay Informed: Key Dates and Resources

  • March 6, 2025: Settlement and opt-out contingency agreements signed.
  • April 16, 2025: Bar order hearing in Houston, Texas.
  • GWG Trust Website: Visit gwgholdingstrust.com/litigation-trust/ for updates.
  • Court Filings: Access documents via the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and Southern District of Texas Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 22-90032).

Contact Iorio Altamirano LLP Today

Iorio Altamirano LLP is a securities arbitration law firm in New York, NY. We represent investors nationwide and vigorously pursue FINRA arbitration claims on behalf of investors to recover investment losses.

Iorio Altamirano LLP was at the forefront of the investigation into the GWG L Bonds starting in late 2021 and has already helped investors recover over $3 million in losses.

Don’t leave your recovery to chance—contact Iorio Altamirano LLP for a free consultation. Call us toll-free at (855) 430-4010 or click the below link to discuss how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve.

Click Here to Schedule Your Free Consultation

On March 7, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against Momentum Advisors LLC, a New York-based registered investment advisory firm, along with its former managing partner Allan J. Boomer and former chief operating officer Tiffany L. Hawkins. The SEC’s orders detail serious breaches of fiduciary duty, including the misuse of client funds, inadequate oversight, and compliance failures. For investors in New York and beyond, this case underscores the importance of vigilance and the potential need for legal recourse through securities arbitration. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, our experienced securities arbitration attorneys are here to help investors protect their rights and recover losses caused by advisor misconduct.

What Happened at Momentum Advisors?

Momentum Advisors LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm headquartered in New York, manages over $350 million in assets. The firm, founded by Allan Boomer and later joined by Tiffany Hawkins, positioned itself as a fiduciary committed to serving clients’ best interests. However, the SEC’s findings reveal a starkly different reality.

Iorio Altamirano LLP, a nationally recognized securities arbitration law firm, is investigating Baker Tilly Capital, LLC, for its role in selling private placement Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) funds, including Block 216 QOF, LLC. This investigation focuses on potential misconduct related to the sale of these high-risk investments to retail investors, particularly in light of recent reports indicating that Block 216, a prominent skyscraper project in Portland, Oregon, featuring the Ritz Carlton Oregon, may be facing foreclosure.

Block 216: A Struggling Opportunity Zone Investment

Block 216, a mixed-use skyscraper in Portland, OR, was marketed as a flagship Opportunity Zone project designed to deliver significant tax benefits and returns to investors through the Block 216 QOF, LLC fund. However, recent developments suggest the project is struggling financially, with reports pointing to a potential foreclosure. This news raises serious questions about the viability of the investment and the due diligence conducted by Baker Tilly Capital, LLC, before it was recommended to investors.

Key Points

  • David Jerke, a former LPL Financial LLC broker, was barred by FINRA for refusing to cooperate with an investigation.
  • LPL Financial terminated him in December 2024 for allegedly soliciting a loan from a customer, violating firm policy and FINRA Rule 3240.

As securities arbitration attorneys advocating for investors against brokerage firms like Merrill Lynch, we frequently encounter cases where brokers breach their duty to act in their clients’ best interests. One such case involves William Worthen King, a former Merrill Lynch broker who was recently sanctioned by FINRA and allowed to resign amid allegations of misconduct. His story highlights the risks investors face and the critical need for accountability in the financial industry. Let’s dive into the details of King’s regulatory troubles, analyze his alarming history of customer disputes, and explore what this means for investors seeking justice.

William King’s FINRA Sanction: A Closer Look

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has suspended former Merrill Lynch broker William King (CRD No. 1432593) for 30 days and assessed a $5,000 monetary fine.  According to FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent No. 222077401201, between January 6, 2021, and January 5, 2023, William King exercised discretion over 204 trades across the accounts of four Merrill Lynch customers without prior written authorization. This conduct violated FINRA Rule 3260(b), which prohibits discretionary trading without explicit client consent, and Rule 2010, which mandates high standards of commercial honor.

If you’re a GWG L Bond investor, the past few years have likely been a rollercoaster of frustration and uncertainty. The bankruptcy of GWG Holdings, Inc. in 2022 left thousands of investors—many of whom are retirees or conservative savers—reeling from significant financial losses. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve been fighting tirelessly for GWG L Bondholders, successfully recovering over $2 million in claims against brokerage firms that misrepresented or inappropriately recommended these risky investments.

Now, a development in the GWG bankruptcy case could open new doors for recovery. On February 28, 2025, the bankruptcy trustee tasked with recovering funds for GWG creditors filed a lawsuit against the prominent law firm Holland & Knight. The complaint, accessible via the GWG bankruptcy docket (Case No. 22-90032, Docket No. 2531), seeks nearly $150 million in damages, alleging that Holland & Knight knowingly participated in a “fraudulent looting scheme and associated criminal enterprise” alongside Dallas-based Beneficient and its CEO, Bradley Heppner.

What Are GWG L Bonds, and Why Did They Fail?

On February 28, 2025, a FINRA arbitration panel delivered a staggering $92 million award against UBS Financial Services, Inc. and its broker, Andrew Burish, marking one of the largest investor victories in recent memory. The case, FINRA No. 21-00488, involved nine claimants who alleged that UBS and Burish mismanaged their accounts by recommending an unsuitable, high-risk strategy of shorting Tesla, Inc. stock. This landmark ruling underscores the accountability of financial giants and the potential for investors to recover losses through arbitration. As a securities arbitration law firm that recently secured a $65,000 award for our client in a GWG L Bonds case (FINRA Case No. 24-00004), we are proud to highlight how cases like these demonstrate the power of FINRA arbitration to deliver justice.

Case Background: A Risky Bet Gone Wrong

The claimants filed their initial Statement of Claim on February 22, 2021, accusing UBS and Burish of breach of fiduciary duty, violation of FINRA suitability rules, negligent supervision, and fraud. The allegations centered on a high-stakes trading strategy that involved shorting Tesla stock—a speculative move designed for short-term gains rather than the long-term wealth preservation the claimants sought. According to the amended claim, UBS and Burish pushed this aggressive approach, provided boilerplate paperwork to unsophisticated investors, and encouraged holding these risky positions despite ballooning losses.

Notice to GPB Capital Investors:  Iorio Altamirano LLP Continues to Investigate The Sale of GPB Capital Private Placement Offerings to Retail Investors

A federal grand jury found GPB Capital Holdings co-founders David Gentile and Jeffry Schneider guilty of fraud. The charges are related to their management of the company, which has been described as a “Ponzi-like scheme.” In February 2021, the SEC also charged GPB Capital, Ascendant Capital, and Ascendant Alternative Strategies with running a Ponzi-like scheme that raised roughly $1.7 billion from securities issued by GPB Capital. According to authorities, the firm raised more than $1.7 billion from over 17,000 investors, many of whom were retirees.

The jury found David Gentile guilty of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and wire fraud. Jeffrey Schneider was found guilty of securities fraud and wire fraud.

What You Need to Know:

  • On July 31, 2024, the SEC announced that it had reached an agreement with Western International Securities and five of its registered representatives to settle an ongoing lawsuit arising out of the sale of high-risk and speculative L Bonds issued by the now-bankrupt GWG Holdings, Inc.
  • On July 28, 2024, the SEC fined broker-dealer LifeMark Securities Corp. for failing to comply with Regulation Best Interest connected with recommending GWG L Bonds to retail customers between July 2020 and January 2022 without exercising reasonable diligence, care, and skill to understand the potential risks, rewards, and costs associated with the recommendations.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced a whistleblower award of more than $37 million to a whistleblower.

The whistleblower provided previously unknown information to the SEC and identified potential witnesses and documents.  The help provided by the whistleblower significantly contributed to a successful enforcement action.

This award is the first payment made to a whistleblower in 2024. By way of comparison, in 2023, the SEC announced nine awards, which paid out over half of a billion dollars to informants. Payments to whistleblowers are made out of an investor protection fund, established by Congress. The investor protection fund is funded by fines and sanctions placed on wrongdoers who violate federal securities laws.

Contact Information