Articles Posted in Best Interest

**Update:  March 14, 2025** Over the past week, the GWG Litigation Trustee has reached agreements with additional defendants to resolve various matters, all of which are subject to court approval.  In addition to the previously reported conditional agreement to settle claims with Beneficient and Brad Heppner for $50.5 million and the settlement with Whitley Penn for $8.5 million (both detailed in our original post below), the Trustee has also secured settlements with Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities for $2.3 million, as well as with the law firm Mayer Brown LLP for $30 million. Collectively, the settlements total approximately $91.3 million, or about 5.6% of the $1.6 billion of GWG L Bonds that were outstanding when GWG filed for bankruptcy in April 2022.  The following is a summary of the settlements to date:

Defendants Allegations Settlement Amount
Brad Heppner and Beneficient (and affiliated trusts and entities) The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that GWG Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates engaged in a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of $1.6 billion in L Bonds, misleading investors about the company’s financial health and the safety of the investments. It claims that the defendants concealed critical information, misrepresented the use of proceeds, and operated a Ponzi-like structure, ultimately harming thousands of investors when the company collapsed into bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$50.5 million
Whitley Penn LLP The allegations against Whitley Penn LLP, GWG Holdings, Inc.’s auditor, include that the company failed to detect and report financial irregularities, contributing to GWG’s fraudulent scheme and subsequent bankruptcy. Whiteley Penn’s actions or inactions allegedly harmed investors.

 

 

$8.5 million
Mayer Brown LLP The allegations against Mayer Brown LLP include that the law firm, as counsel to GWG Holdings, Inc. before and after its bankruptcy filing, provided deficient legal advice and engaged in conflicts of interest, contributing to the company’s fraudulent activities and eventual bankruptcy. Pre-bankruptcy allegations include that the law firm aided and abetted GWG fiduciaries’ breaches of their fiduciary duties in certain transactions.

 

$30 million
Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, and related companies engaged in breaches of fiduciary duty and fraudulent conduct as officers, directors, or affiliates of GWG Holdings, Inc., contributing to its financial collapse and bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$2.3 million

 

Original Post:

In a significant development for GWG Holdings, Inc. L Bond investors, a $50.5 million settlement agreement was announced on March 7, 2025, aimed at resolving long-standing litigation tied to the company’s bankruptcy. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve been at the forefront of advocating for GWG L Bond investors, having already recovered over $3 million for our clients. This proposed settlement with certain defendants, including Beneficient and Brad Heppner, could impact thousands of investors who suffered losses when GWG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2022. Here’s what you need to know about the settlement, its implications, and how our firm can help you navigate this complex process.

Key Takeaways from the GWG L Bond Settlement

  • Settlement Amount: $50.5 million to be paid by Defendants’ insurers, pending court approval.
  • Litigation Resolved: Covers both a class action securities lawsuit and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding. The settlement resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021.
  • Distribution: Funds will be allocated to holders of Allowed Claims in GWG’s bankruptcy case, with an estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds before deductions. That’s a little over three cents for every dollar invested.
  • Opt-Out Contingency: The settlement could be terminated if too many investors opt out, with specific deadlines in place.
  • Bar Order Hearing: A hearing to finalize a bar order protecting settling Defendants is scheduled for April 16, 2025.
  • Next Steps for Investors: The best avenue of recovery for most GWG L Bond investors remains filing securities arbitration claims against the brokerage firm that sold these risky and speculative securities. Contact our law firm today for a free and no-obligation consultation.
  • Settlement with Whitley Penn: Separately, the GWG Litigation Trustee is seeking approval to settle claims with the accounting firm Whitley Penn for $8.5 million.

Understanding the GWG Holdings Settlement

Background: GWG’s Financial Collapse

GWG Holdings, Inc., a Dallas-based financial services company, marketed L Bonds as a high-yield investment tied to life insurance policies. However, the company faced mounting debt—over $1.3 billion in L Bonds—and regulatory scrutiny, culminating in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on April 20, 2022. This left thousands of investors, many of whom were retirees or conservative savers, with significant losses.

Since then, litigation has unfolded to recover funds for affected investors. The recent settlement marks a pivotal step in this process, addressing claims from both a securities class action (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding (Adv. Pro. No. 24-03090).

Settlement Details

Announced on March 7, 2025, the $50.5 million settlement involves Lead Plaintiff Frank Moore, GWG Litigation Trustee Michael Goldberg, and Defendants, including Brad Heppner and Beneficient entities. Key points include:

  • Funding: The settlement is financed entirely by the Defendants’ insurers, with proceeds forming a Settlement Fund plus interest.
  • Scope: It resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021, alleging securities law violations due to misleading statements in GWG’s Registration Statement.
  • Distribution Process: After deductions for taxes, administration costs, and attorneys’ fees (up to $8.48 million for Class Counsel and 35% for Trust Counsel), the net fund will be distributed through GWG’s bankruptcy plan. Investors with Allowed Claims can expect an average of $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds, though this is before deductions.

The settlement requires approval from both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Notices will be sent to eligible investors with options to participate, object, or opt out.

Opt-Out Contingency: A Critical Clause

A supplemental agreement, also dated March 6, 2025, introduces an opt-out threshold. If too many class members exclude themselves, the Defendants can terminate the settlement. This contingency underscores the importance of understanding your rights:

  • Deadlines: Opt-out requests must be tracked, with Defendants notified 14 days before the Settlement Hearing and a termination decision due 3 days prior.
  • Flexibility: Investors can retract opt-outs, potentially preserving the settlement if the threshold is met post-withdrawal.

This clause adds uncertainty, making legal guidance essential for investors deciding their next steps.

Bar Order Motion: Ensuring Finality

On March 7, 2025, a motion was filed to secure a bar order, preventing third parties from pursuing GWG-related claims against settling Defendants. This protects the Defendants in exchange for committing nearly all D&O insurance proceeds to the settlement. A hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. in Houston, Texas, with notice provided via the GWG Trust website and other channels.

What This Means for GWG L Bond Investors

Limited Recovery Potential

While $50.5 million is a substantial sum, it pales in comparison to GWG’s $1.3 billion L Bond debt. The estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit recovery—before fees and costs—suggests a modest return for investors. For those with significant holdings, this may not fully offset losses, highlighting the need for personalized legal strategies.

Next Steps for Investors

  • Review Your Eligibility: Confirm if you hold an Allowed Claim under GWG’s bankruptcy plan.
  • Evaluate Options: Decide whether to participate, opt out, or object to the settlement, keeping opt-out deadlines in mind.
  • Seek Legal Advice: The complexity of this settlement, coupled with the opt-out contingency and bar order, requires expert guidance to maximize recovery.

How Iorio Altamirano LLP Can Help

At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve recovered over $3 million for GWG L Bond investors through diligent advocacy and strategic litigation against broker-dealers and registered investment advisory firms that sold the GWG L Bonds to retail investors.

With the recovery to investors through the GWG Litigation Trustee’s efforts are likely to be nominal (in this case, a little over three cents for each dollar invested into GWG L Bonds), we continue to believe that GWG L Bonds investors’ best avenue for potential recovery of losses is to file a separate FINRA arbitration claim against their brokerage firms.

Our experience positions us uniquely to assist you in this settlement process:

  • Case Evaluation: We’ll assess your potential claims, explain your options, and guide you through the arbitration process.
  • Maximizing Recovery: Beyond this settlement, we explore additional avenues to recover losses, including claims against brokers or advisors who recommended GWG L Bonds.
  • Proven Results: Our track record speaks for itself—our clients trust us to fight for their financial recovery. We know as much about what happened with GWG Holdings, Inc. and how brokerage firms sold the risky and speculative GWG L Bonds as anyone.

Stay Informed: Key Dates and Resources

  • March 6, 2025: Settlement and opt-out contingency agreements signed.
  • April 16, 2025: Bar order hearing in Houston, Texas.
  • GWG Trust Website: Visit gwgholdingstrust.com/litigation-trust/ for updates.
  • Court Filings: Access documents via the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and Southern District of Texas Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 22-90032).

Contact Iorio Altamirano LLP Today

Iorio Altamirano LLP is a securities arbitration law firm in New York, NY. We represent investors nationwide and vigorously pursue FINRA arbitration claims on behalf of investors to recover investment losses.

Iorio Altamirano LLP was at the forefront of the investigation into the GWG L Bonds starting in late 2021 and has already helped investors recover over $3 million in losses.

Don’t leave your recovery to chance—contact Iorio Altamirano LLP for a free consultation. Call us toll-free at (855) 430-4010 or click the below link to discuss how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve.

Click Here to Schedule Your Free Consultation

Iorio Altamirano LLP, a securities arbitration law firm based in New York, NY, is investigating potential securities arbitration claims against Western International Securities, Inc. and its Pennsylvania-based broker, Heath Goldstein, for its sale of L Bonds issued by GWG Holdings, Inc. Western International Securities was part of a network of broker-dealers who sold the speculative, high-risk, and illiquid GWG L Bonds to retail investors.

GWG Holdings, Inc., which stopped making interest and maturity payments to GWG L Bond investors in January 2022, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2022.

According to court filings, in the four years before the bankruptcy filing, Western International Securities received at least $3 million in commissions from GWG Holdings for selling L Bonds to retail investors, and the firm sold approximately $13.3 million in L Bonds to retail investors between June 2020 and January 2022.

On January 30, 2023, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published a Risk Alert including its observations from Broker-Dealer Examinations Related to Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”).  The risk alert highlights deficiencies observed during regulatory examinations, as well as weak practices by broker-dealers that could result in deficiencies.

Reg BI requires that brokerage firms and brokers act in the best interest of a retail customer at the time of a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold a security or investment strategy.  The broker-dealer and broker must place their retail customers’ interest ahead of their own financial interest.  The standard of care also applies to recommendations of account types.

Reg BI requires compliance with four component obligations:

On September 14, 2022, Western International Securities, Inc. filed its Answer to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Complaint denying that the firm violated the standards under Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”) in approving, recommending, and supervising the sale of speculative, high-risk, and illiquid L Bonds issued by GWG Holdings, Inc.

The case, which is being litigated in the United States District Court of the Central District of California, is being closely watched by investors and the securities industry alike because it is the first substantive enforcement action brought by the SEC against a broker-dealer since Reg BI went into effect on June 30, 2020.

See AlsoLaw Firm Investigating the Sale of GWG L Bonds to Retail Investors by Western International Securities, Inc.

In an annual report more than two decades ago, Warren Buffett dispensed some wise words of knowledge: “You only find out who is swimming naked when the tide goes out.Reportedly, Mr. Buffett was referring to knowing what risks a company is taking until it faces adverse conditions.  Mr. Buffett used the same phrase again in 2008 about the foolishness of large financial institutions exposed by falling home prices.

Mr. Buffett’s words of wisdom can also be applied to investment recommendations made by a financial advisor in a bull market.  Almost everyone looks like a genius in a booming market, including financial advisors.  However, when the stock market enters into a correction, or something even more dreadful, the real risks of an investment or investment strategy are exposed, often leaving a trail of investment losses in their wake.

Investors who have suffered investment losses due to unsuitable or misleading investment recommendations by brokers or brokerage firms should consult with a lawyer to review their legal rights.

You worked hard, opened a brokerage or retirement account, and invested your savings with a financial advisor or stockbroker, only to suffer financial losses due to bad investment advice, misleading sales pitches, or brokers that were driven by commissions.  Now what?

Can I Sue My Financial Advisor Over Losses?

Yes, you can sue your financial advisor or broker to recover investment losses if the broker did not have your best interest in mind when they made an investment recommendation or offered investment advice.  You can also sue your financial advisor or broker if the financial advisor misrepresented or omitted material facts that an investor should have known about the security or investment strategy.

As Joe Biden takes his place as the 46th President of the United States of America, House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., urges the Biden Administration to rescind Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI).

In a letter dated December 4, 2020, Rep. Waters outlined dozens of Trump-era regulations promulgated during the Trump administration that should be rescinded or replaced by the new administration.

Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI), which went into effect on June 30, 2020, establishes a standard of conduct for broker-dealers and brokers when they make a recommendation to a retail customer of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities. When a broker-dealer makes an investment recommendation, the investor is entitled to a recommendation that is in the investor’s best interest and does not place the interest of the financial professional or financial institution ahead of the retail investors’ interests.

Investing your money is a great way to grow your wealth, save for retirement, and reach your financial goals.  If you invest in the appropriate products, you can also receive income from investments, build on-pre-tax dollars, or reduce taxable income.

If you do not invest, you miss out on opportunities to increase your wealth.  However, all investments carry risk, and when you invest, you have the potential to lose money.

There are many different types of investments.  Some common types of investments include stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, mutual funds, money market funds, exchange-traded funds, and annuities.  There are also more complex investment vehicles, such as real estate investment trusts (REITs), unit investment trusts (UITs), hedge funds, commodities, and private placements.

When an investor suffers harm, including investment losses, due to misconduct by a financial advisor or broker-dealer, the investor can file a securities arbitration claim against their financial advisor and/or broker-dealer in an effort to be compensated. The case will be presented and defended in an arbitration proceeding to a panel of arbitrators instead of a court of law in front of a judge and jury.

Arbitration is the primary forum for resolving disputes between investors and brokerage firms or financial advisors because the parties have contractually agreed to use arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution process. When an investor opens an account with a broker-dealer, the investor is required to sign an array of account opening documents. These account opening documents regularly include an arbitration clause, which requires that arbitration be used as an alternative to litigation. This requirement is often a contractually binding obligation for both parties. As a result, disputes between investors and financial advisors or brokerage firms are resolved in arbitration as an alternative to court.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is authorized by Congress to regulate the financial services industry and operates the largest arbitration forum for securities disputes. Most securities arbitrations take place using FINRA’s Dispute Resolution Services’ arbitration forum because, as FINRA members, financial advisors and brokerage firms are required to arbitrate customer complaints upon the filing of a claim through FINRA.

Iorio Altamirano LLP is investigating whether registered stockbrokers and financial advisors inappropriately recommended that customers purchase common stock of Eastman Kodak Company (KODK).

Iorio Altamirano LLP is an investor advocate law firm based in New York, NY. We help investors recover financial losses due to wrongful conduct by financial advisors and brokerage firms.

If you suffered financial losses from an investment in Kodak stock recommended to you or purchased on your behalf by a stockbroker or financial advisor, contact New York investor protection attorney August Iorio of Iorio Altamirano LLP.  August Iorio, a native of Rochester, New York, can be reached at august@ia-law.com or toll-free at (855) 430-4010 for a free and confidential evaluation of your account.

Contact Information