Articles Tagged with Securities and Exchange Commission

**Update:  March 14, 2025** Over the past week, the GWG Litigation Trustee has reached agreements with additional defendants to resolve various matters, all of which are subject to court approval.  In addition to the previously reported conditional agreement to settle claims with Beneficient and Brad Heppner for $50.5 million and the settlement with Whitley Penn for $8.5 million (both detailed in our original post below), the Trustee has also secured settlements with Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities for $2.3 million, as well as with the law firm Mayer Brown LLP for $30 million. Collectively, the settlements total approximately $91.3 million, or about 5.6% of the $1.6 billion of GWG L Bonds that were outstanding when GWG filed for bankruptcy in April 2022.  The following is a summary of the settlements to date:

Defendants Allegations Settlement Amount
Brad Heppner and Beneficient (and affiliated trusts and entities) The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that GWG Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates engaged in a fraudulent scheme involving the sale of $1.6 billion in L Bonds, misleading investors about the company’s financial health and the safety of the investments. It claims that the defendants concealed critical information, misrepresented the use of proceeds, and operated a Ponzi-like structure, ultimately harming thousands of investors when the company collapsed into bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$50.5 million
Whitley Penn LLP The allegations against Whitley Penn LLP, GWG Holdings, Inc.’s auditor, include that the company failed to detect and report financial irregularities, contributing to GWG’s fraudulent scheme and subsequent bankruptcy. Whiteley Penn’s actions or inactions allegedly harmed investors.

 

 

$8.5 million
Mayer Brown LLP The allegations against Mayer Brown LLP include that the law firm, as counsel to GWG Holdings, Inc. before and after its bankruptcy filing, provided deficient legal advice and engaged in conflicts of interest, contributing to the company’s fraudulent activities and eventual bankruptcy. Pre-bankruptcy allegations include that the law firm aided and abetted GWG fiduciaries’ breaches of their fiduciary duties in certain transactions.

 

$30 million
Jon R. Sabes, Steven F. Sabes, and their affiliated trusts and entities The complaint filed on April 19, 2024, alleges that Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, and related companies engaged in breaches of fiduciary duty and fraudulent conduct as officers, directors, or affiliates of GWG Holdings, Inc., contributing to its financial collapse and bankruptcy in 2022.

 

$2.3 million

 

Original Post:

In a significant development for GWG Holdings, Inc. L Bond investors, a $50.5 million settlement agreement was announced on March 7, 2025, aimed at resolving long-standing litigation tied to the company’s bankruptcy. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve been at the forefront of advocating for GWG L Bond investors, having already recovered over $3 million for our clients. This proposed settlement with certain defendants, including Beneficient and Brad Heppner, could impact thousands of investors who suffered losses when GWG filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2022. Here’s what you need to know about the settlement, its implications, and how our firm can help you navigate this complex process.

Key Takeaways from the GWG L Bond Settlement

  • Settlement Amount: $50.5 million to be paid by Defendants’ insurers, pending court approval.
  • Litigation Resolved: Covers both a class action securities lawsuit and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding. The settlement resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021.
  • Distribution: Funds will be allocated to holders of Allowed Claims in GWG’s bankruptcy case, with an estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds before deductions. That’s a little over three cents for every dollar invested.
  • Opt-Out Contingency: The settlement could be terminated if too many investors opt out, with specific deadlines in place.
  • Bar Order Hearing: A hearing to finalize a bar order protecting settling Defendants is scheduled for April 16, 2025.
  • Next Steps for Investors: The best avenue of recovery for most GWG L Bond investors remains filing securities arbitration claims against the brokerage firm that sold these risky and speculative securities. Contact our law firm today for a free and no-obligation consultation.
  • Settlement with Whitley Penn: Separately, the GWG Litigation Trustee is seeking approval to settle claims with the accounting firm Whitley Penn for $8.5 million.

Understanding the GWG Holdings Settlement

Background: GWG’s Financial Collapse

GWG Holdings, Inc., a Dallas-based financial services company, marketed L Bonds as a high-yield investment tied to life insurance policies. However, the company faced mounting debt—over $1.3 billion in L Bonds—and regulatory scrutiny, culminating in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on April 20, 2022. This left thousands of investors, many of whom were retirees or conservative savers, with significant losses.

Since then, litigation has unfolded to recover funds for affected investors. The recent settlement marks a pivotal step in this process, addressing claims from both a securities class action (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and a bankruptcy adversary proceeding (Adv. Pro. No. 24-03090).

Settlement Details

Announced on March 7, 2025, the $50.5 million settlement involves Lead Plaintiff Frank Moore, GWG Litigation Trustee Michael Goldberg, and Defendants, including Brad Heppner and Beneficient entities. Key points include:

  • Funding: The settlement is financed entirely by the Defendants’ insurers, with proceeds forming a Settlement Fund plus interest.
  • Scope: It resolves claims for investors who purchased GWG L Bonds between June 3, 2020, and April 16, 2021, alleging securities law violations due to misleading statements in GWG’s Registration Statement.
  • Distribution Process: After deductions for taxes, administration costs, and attorneys’ fees (up to $8.48 million for Class Counsel and 35% for Trust Counsel), the net fund will be distributed through GWG’s bankruptcy plan. Investors with Allowed Claims can expect an average of $31.48 per $1,000 Unit of L Bonds, though this is before deductions.

The settlement requires approval from both the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Notices will be sent to eligible investors with options to participate, object, or opt out.

Opt-Out Contingency: A Critical Clause

A supplemental agreement, also dated March 6, 2025, introduces an opt-out threshold. If too many class members exclude themselves, the Defendants can terminate the settlement. This contingency underscores the importance of understanding your rights:

  • Deadlines: Opt-out requests must be tracked, with Defendants notified 14 days before the Settlement Hearing and a termination decision due 3 days prior.
  • Flexibility: Investors can retract opt-outs, potentially preserving the settlement if the threshold is met post-withdrawal.

This clause adds uncertainty, making legal guidance essential for investors deciding their next steps.

Bar Order Motion: Ensuring Finality

On March 7, 2025, a motion was filed to secure a bar order, preventing third parties from pursuing GWG-related claims against settling Defendants. This protects the Defendants in exchange for committing nearly all D&O insurance proceeds to the settlement. A hearing is scheduled for April 16, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. in Houston, Texas, with notice provided via the GWG Trust website and other channels.

What This Means for GWG L Bond Investors

Limited Recovery Potential

While $50.5 million is a substantial sum, it pales in comparison to GWG’s $1.3 billion L Bond debt. The estimated $31.48 per $1,000 Unit recovery—before fees and costs—suggests a modest return for investors. For those with significant holdings, this may not fully offset losses, highlighting the need for personalized legal strategies.

Next Steps for Investors

  • Review Your Eligibility: Confirm if you hold an Allowed Claim under GWG’s bankruptcy plan.
  • Evaluate Options: Decide whether to participate, opt out, or object to the settlement, keeping opt-out deadlines in mind.
  • Seek Legal Advice: The complexity of this settlement, coupled with the opt-out contingency and bar order, requires expert guidance to maximize recovery.

How Iorio Altamirano LLP Can Help

At Iorio Altamirano LLP, we’ve recovered over $3 million for GWG L Bond investors through diligent advocacy and strategic litigation against broker-dealers and registered investment advisory firms that sold the GWG L Bonds to retail investors.

With the recovery to investors through the GWG Litigation Trustee’s efforts are likely to be nominal (in this case, a little over three cents for each dollar invested into GWG L Bonds), we continue to believe that GWG L Bonds investors’ best avenue for potential recovery of losses is to file a separate FINRA arbitration claim against their brokerage firms.

Our experience positions us uniquely to assist you in this settlement process:

  • Case Evaluation: We’ll assess your potential claims, explain your options, and guide you through the arbitration process.
  • Maximizing Recovery: Beyond this settlement, we explore additional avenues to recover losses, including claims against brokers or advisors who recommended GWG L Bonds.
  • Proven Results: Our track record speaks for itself—our clients trust us to fight for their financial recovery. We know as much about what happened with GWG Holdings, Inc. and how brokerage firms sold the risky and speculative GWG L Bonds as anyone.

Stay Informed: Key Dates and Resources

  • March 6, 2025: Settlement and opt-out contingency agreements signed.
  • April 16, 2025: Bar order hearing in Houston, Texas.
  • GWG Trust Website: Visit gwgholdingstrust.com/litigation-trust/ for updates.
  • Court Filings: Access documents via the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 3:22-cv-00410-B) and Southern District of Texas Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 22-90032).

Contact Iorio Altamirano LLP Today

Iorio Altamirano LLP is a securities arbitration law firm in New York, NY. We represent investors nationwide and vigorously pursue FINRA arbitration claims on behalf of investors to recover investment losses.

Iorio Altamirano LLP was at the forefront of the investigation into the GWG L Bonds starting in late 2021 and has already helped investors recover over $3 million in losses.

Don’t leave your recovery to chance—contact Iorio Altamirano LLP for a free consultation. Call us toll-free at (855) 430-4010 or click the below link to discuss how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve.

Click Here to Schedule Your Free Consultation

On March 7, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settled charges against Momentum Advisors LLC, a New York-based registered investment advisory firm, along with its former managing partner Allan J. Boomer and former chief operating officer Tiffany L. Hawkins. The SEC’s orders detail serious breaches of fiduciary duty, including the misuse of client funds, inadequate oversight, and compliance failures. For investors in New York and beyond, this case underscores the importance of vigilance and the potential need for legal recourse through securities arbitration. At Iorio Altamirano LLP, our experienced securities arbitration attorneys are here to help investors protect their rights and recover losses caused by advisor misconduct.

What Happened at Momentum Advisors?

Momentum Advisors LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisory firm headquartered in New York, manages over $350 million in assets. The firm, founded by Allan Boomer and later joined by Tiffany Hawkins, positioned itself as a fiduciary committed to serving clients’ best interests. However, the SEC’s findings reveal a starkly different reality.

What You Need to Know:

  • On July 31, 2024, the SEC announced that it had reached an agreement with Western International Securities and five of its registered representatives to settle an ongoing lawsuit arising out of the sale of high-risk and speculative L Bonds issued by the now-bankrupt GWG Holdings, Inc.
  • On July 28, 2024, the SEC fined broker-dealer LifeMark Securities Corp. for failing to comply with Regulation Best Interest connected with recommending GWG L Bonds to retail customers between July 2020 and January 2022 without exercising reasonable diligence, care, and skill to understand the potential risks, rewards, and costs associated with the recommendations.

Iorio Altamirano LLP and its experienced GWG Holdings L Bonds attorneys continue to investigate and file claims against Centaurus Financial for its sale of risky and speculative GWG L Bonds to mom-and-pop investors.

The law firm’s investigation is ongoing after two separate FINRA arbitration panels awarded investors damages in connection with the sale of L Bonds by their brokers and brokerage firms. In the first case, an arbitration panel in Los Angeles, California, held two brokers liable for their negligence in selling GWG L Bonds to an investor and awarded over $1 million in damages. In the second case, a FINRA arbitration panel in Boston, Massachusetts, awarded an investor $280,000 in damages, finding that brokerage firm Ages Financial Services, LTD was liable for not properly informing the investor about the risks of GWG L Bonds.

Iorio Altamirano LLP represents dozens of GWG L Bond investors across the country and encourages investors who are taking a “wait and see approach” to act now.   As the GWG Wind Trustee begins to liquidate GWG’s assets, it is becoming more evident that the GWG L Bonds, now the New Series A1 WDT Interests, are nearly worthless.

**Update: November 1, 2023** On October 13, 2023, the GWG Wind Down Trust sold two of its four assets for only approximately $10.5 million. The GWG Wind Down Trust sold its largest tangible asset, its portfolio of life insurance policies, realizing only $10 million in cash. In addition, on October 13, 2023, the GWG Wind Down Trust sold its equity interest in Foxo Technologies, Inc. for $586,943. The $10.5 million in recovery represents approximately 0.8% of the $1.3 billion in obligations owed to L Bond investors/creditors.

Further, over the past month, the share price of Beneficent has continued to fall and is currently trading at approximately $0.60 per share.

We continue to believe that GWG L Bonds investors’ best avenue for potential recovery of losses is to file a separate FINRA arbitration claim against their brokerage firms. Iorio Altamirano LLP has already helped GWG L Bond investors recover over $1.4 million in losses.

An elderly couple in their upper 80s filed a FINRA arbitration claim against David Lerner Associates, Inc. (“David Lerner Associates”) to recover losses and damages of up to $1 million. The couple, represented by securities arbitration law firm Iorio Altamirano LLP, alleges that David Lerner Associates recommended an unsuitable investment strategy to invest and concentrate a significant portion of their retirement savings and net worth into risky and high-commission energy-sector securities that were proprietary to David Lerner Associates, Inc.: (1) Energy 11, L.P. (“Energy 11”); (2) Energy Resources 12, L.P. (“Energy 12”); and the Spirit of America  Energy Fund (“SOAEX”).

The arbitration claim also alleges that David Lerner Associates and its broker, Robert Rasbach, misrepresented and omitted material information about the investment strategy and the energy investments, including:

  • That investing in Energy 11 and Energy 12 involved a “high degree of risk” and was only appropriate for investors willing and able to assume the risk of a “speculative, illiquid, and long-term investment.”

Introduction

When disputes arise between investors and brokerage firms, they are usually resolved through arbitration.  The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) offers a streamlined and cost-effective dispute resolution forum for resolving disputes in the securities industry. In this blog post, we’ll take a deep dive into FINRA arbitration, its key features, benefits, and what you should know if you find yourself involved in a securities-related dispute.

Understanding FINRA Arbitration

On June 20, 2023, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas entered an Order confirming GWG’s Further Modified Second Joint Chapter 11 Plan (the “Chapter 11 Plan”).

GWG has disclosed that they are targeting July 31, 2023, as the effective date for the Plan.

As part of the Chapter 11 Plan, GWG will no longer operate as an ongoing concern. Instead, the Chapter 11 Plan provides that the GWG will be liquidated, and two liquidating trusts will be created: (i) the Wind Down Trust and (ii) the Litigation Trust.

On Tuesday, June 6, 2023, Jeffrey Lash, a former executive of GPB Capital Holdings, pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud in federal court in Brooklyn, NY.

In 2021, a federal grand jury brought criminal charges against Lash, David Gentile (founder and owner of GPB Capital), and a third individual, Jeffry Schneider. The charges are related to their management of the company, which has been described as a “Ponzi-like scheme.” In February 2021, the SEC also charged GPB Capital, Ascendant Capital, and Ascendant Alternative Strategies with running a Ponzi-like scheme that raised roughly $1.7 billion from over 17,000 investors, many of whom were retirees.

The criminal complaint alleged that Mr. Gentile, Mr. Lash, and Mr. Schneider used new money invested by retail investors to cover the promised 8% returns to prior investors, yet failed to disclose the source of the distributions to investors.

In a recent regulatory case, on May 5, 2023, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Office of Hearing Officers imposed sanctions on Centaurus Financial, Inc. and its financial advisor Donnie Ingram for engaging in unsuitable and unethical practices, as well as supervisory failures. Centaurus Financial, Inc. was censured and ordered to pay a $50,000 fine and $388,962 in restitution to harmed customers. Donnie Ingram was suspended from association with any FINRA member firm in any capacity for six months, fined $15,000, and ordered to pay $388,962 in restitution to harmed customers. The sanctions were the result of Ingram’s unsuitable recommendations to customers to purchase Unit Investment Trusts (UITs), Bluerock Residential Growth REIT Inc. (BRG), and MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MAC) at higher costs when there were lower cost options available.

Earlier this year, in February 2023, Centaurus Financial also agreed to pay a $750,000 civil penalty after the SEC charged the firm in connection with the unsuitable recommendation of variable interest rate structured products to retail customers. The SEC’s order found that Centaurus failed to implement, and its branch manager failed to follow, Centaurus’ customer-specific suitability procedures and that Centaurus violated the broker-dealer books and records provisions of the federal securities laws. The SEC’s order found that Centaurus violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rules 17a-4(e)(5), 17a-4(f)(2), and 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(B)(3) thereunder. The SEC concluded that Centaurus failed reasonably to supervise the firm’s brokers.

Financial institutions like Centaurus Financial, Inc. must properly supervise financial advisors and customer accounts. Brokerage firms must establish and maintain a reasonably designed system to oversee account activity, such as recommendations to purchase alternative investments, such as GWG L Bonds, UITs, and REITS, to ensure compliance with securities laws and industry regulations.  When a brokerage firm fails to supervise its financial advisors or the investment account activity sufficiently, it may be liable for investment losses sustained by customers.

Contact Information